AVAST ENDPOINT PROTECTION ADVANCED. ... SOFTWARE
AVAST ENDPOINT PROTECTION ADVANCED. ... PLUS

AVAST ENDPOINT PROTECTION ADVANCED. ... SOFTWARE

The lab at AV-TEST already assesses this classical protection every two months with its certification tests for corporate protection software and thus evaluates the consistent security of the products. And then on the false positives they used 1000 (again extremely likely) because of the lowest number being 0.10%.Every day, protection solutions for corporate users normally have to detect, classify and fend off thousands of attackers. Well it's possibly th ey used any number of 8, like 16 24 32 but that's extremely unlikely because there's not even one 6.25% test. In the exploit/fileless test, they go by 12.50%, so they used exactly 8 samples. But ofc i highly doubt they applied SRPs and all the other stuff from Configure Defender for testing Helix Webroot 0% ~ Off Topic Video Removed ~Д¬lick to expand.MRG Effitas is jsut as trashД®veryone getting 99% and 100%, no conclusions at all other than Malwarebytes and Trend Micro are trash (or not configured properly, or bad default configuration)ДЄlso u can tell the amount of tests they used by the number. Pretty much the only think that bypasses it is Trusted Stuff, but it's not easy to get such trusted certificate for malware. I don't know about the other AVs but chances are they used default settings but ESET failing with 0% is quite disappointing if there isn't smth that isn't turned on by default that would make all the difference (like avast's hardened mode would).ДЄlso Microsoft with Configure Defender should definitely get higher score, i think. but the protection stuff is usually the same as in the home version aka nothing new is added altho for some it is.Д«itdefender getting 36% is not surprising at all if we judge by that Kaspersky vs Bitdefender video in youtube where kaspersky with just 1 component has 100% protection rate while bitdefender with ALL its components still misses 1 sample out of like 60 smth. Keep in mind the Enterprise version of many vendors is the same as the home version with maybe more indepth firewall scanning and ofc all the enterprise tools like cloud management remote management control panel etc. Also i think avast is missing because its hardened mode would slaughter ransomware. So while Kaspersky may have inflated its score (although again if someone else got 86% kaspersky getting 100% legitimately is not unreasonable at all), at least we know the scores of the other programs are correct. At the very least they should be with default settings, but i highly doubt Kasperksy went on and just used the worst settings, after all, AV-TEST is not just gonna stand there and look while the kaspersky guy is setting the worst settings for the other programs. This is actually the only av-test worth looking at, av-test's normal tests are useless cuz they all say 99% or stuff like that, cruelsister been saying it for long time that they're useless cuz everyone gets high scores cuz they scan easy files or old files.Д®ven if you take kaspersky's results with a grain of salt, the results of the other programs should not be modified.

AVAST ENDPOINT PROTECTION ADVANCED. ... PLUS

Plus this is the only av-test that doesn't show all vendors with 99% protection rate, so it is actually useful.

If one vendor got 86% in one of the tests Kaspersky getting 100% is definitly not out of 'not cheated in any way' territory.

Avast endpoint protection advanced. ...